Even though she got engaged to a 73-year-old foreign billionaire at an expensive hotel, the 27-year-old girl suddenly announced her separation for an unexpected reason.

Breaking off love after 2 weeks of “cold war”

In recent days, the age-gap affair between Co Ngan (27 years old, Ho Chi Minh City) and American billionaire Wynn Katz (73 years old, American) has caused a stir in public opinion. Recently, on her social networking page, Co Ngan announced that she broke up with her fiance after petty arguments.

Ngan’s sharing happened at a time when the world was celebrating April Fool’s Day (April 1), so many people thought that this was just a joke from the young girl to entertain her fans. However, when asked, this “hot girl” affirmed that the breakup was true and completely serious.

“We really broke up. This is not an April Fool’s game. We argued and broke up like any other couple,” Co Ngan said.

“When she heard the reason why we broke up, my mother was also very surprised. My mother also advised me to ignore those trivial things so that we could be together. However, if that’s the case, the feeling that I’m just someone and he will choose someone other than me still exists, making me tired,” Co Ngan added.

Amidst the chaos of emotions, the young girl shared that, although she proactively said goodbye, she still missed and regretted the past months. Ngan said, the time they loved each other were a series of happy days. Therefore, when she had to go to the step of separation, she couldn’t help but feel sad.

However, currently, what makes the girl more heartbroken is that after the story of her separation from her billionaire lover was published, a lot of information appeared that was not true, had a negative view, and was not true to the question. topic.

Co Ngan shared: “Many people said I loved you for money, but now it’s enough so we broke up. This is not true. If I loved for money, I wouldn’t be foolish enough to say goodbye. Some people said I wanted to break up with Katz to find someone new… Even some news sites deliberately misunderstood what I said and wrote an article that was not true to the nature of the problem.”